Why is this page text-only?

Latest News


B.L. Ochman, president whatsnextonline.com

B.L. Ochman B.L. Ochman

elephant.png

Mainstream media is still scared of bloggers. And they should be. We're watching them very closely. Every day. Just like they watch us. Only we credit and link to them. Maybe some day they'll return the courtesy.

Headline in a Page One story in the NY Times: (sub required, try Bug Me Not) "In Court Ruling on Executions, a Factual Flaw" Make that two factual flaws. The first one by the Supreme Court; the second by the Times, whose headline should read "CAAFlog Blogger Discovers Factual Flaw in Court Ruling on Executions." But the Times, like much of MSM, just can't seem to stand giving a blogger credit for a scoop.

It took the Times til the fourth paragraph to mention that Dwight Sullivan broke the story on June 28th on the CAAFlog Blog, and til the eighth paragraph to link to his post. A post on the blog today wryly notes "It may take a few clicks to reach CAAFlog's post on the case."

Magazines and newspapers still report on blogs as curiosities, or that old standby – personal diaries. They need to get over themselves. Blogs are a new medium, and we’re here to stay. That said, of the supposed 70 million blogs there are perhaps 10,000 with a significant number of readers. My blog, What's Next Blog, getsapproximately 10,000 uniques a day. Small potatoes compared to blogs like Boing Boing, that get a million uniques a week, but still respectable, influential, and widely quoted.

I'm not going to get into the tired debate over whether bloggers are journalists. Some of us are. Some of us are not. But you can't put someone who blogs about their cat into the same category as someone whose blog covers industry news or law any more than you can put "Meet the Press" in the same category as "Dancing With the Stars."

White House issues statement about Times report
In his post, Sullivan noted that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, which was passed by Congress, did set out death as punishment for the rape of a child. In fact, none of the 10 briefs lawyers filed in the case mentioned a bill Bush signed last September adding child rape to the military death penalty.

Like the game of telephone, where the original message is lost, MSM quickly loses mention of the CAAFlog scoop, and credits the Times for the story. Dan Slater, WSJ Law Blog credits "the NY Time’s Linda Greenhouse, who ... thinks she’s caught the Court out on a flaw in its facts." The LA Times Blog doesn't even mention CAAFlog in its post.

The issue, with no mention of the CAAFlog, has reached the White House, and the Washington Post writes: "White House press secretary Dana Perino this morning said "The White House was disturbed by the New York Times report that the court’s decision might be based on a mistake..."

Likewise, UPI credits the Times for the scoop.

Only the American Bar Association blog gets the headline right "Blogger Points Out Substantial Error in Supreme Court Decision"

Related:
Do Bloggers Break News?
Blogger Huffington Blasts "Old" Media
AP vs Blogger BrouHaHa New Realities for Old Media
TechNewsWorld: The Top 10 News Stories Broken By Bloggers


B.L. Ochman
Internet marketer, internationally known blogger, blog strategy consultant to Fortune 500 companies including IBM and Cendant, B.L. Ochman heads the creative team of whatsnextonline.com. She publishes the internationally respected What's Next Blog, and the Ethics Crisis blog.

Post new comment


  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.